WHOM YOU PEJE PEJE
published an excellent article by Octavio Rodríguez Araujo Master, stating that Mexico Socialismo Revolucionario (SRM) is not PRD, whose totally disclaim policy. Nor are we Obrador's movement called brown, but if we express our agreement with the analysis of the Master Araujo.
It is time to analyze it beyond adjectives, beyond I think of I think. Our people deserve the effort of those who fought for the return for one, two, one thousand views to inform and help shape opinions on the momentous elections of 2012 and prevent the political mercanchifles Pulu in the media are the only to "think" about it. Serious analysis, strictly as a political scientist and Master of Araujo invite all organizations and individuals who claim the move to send, with a commitment to give them the space to consider.
"LE PEJE" WHOM " PEJE"
Octavio Rodríguez Araujo * [1]
I've never used " peje " to refer to Andrés Manuel López Obrador. So he called his detractors and enemies, is an expression of contempt or chunga. But now I use it because it goes with " you no matter who likes it "
This phrase serves as a title a una canción de Vicente Fernández, pero también se refiere a verdades que molestan, por ejemplo: en 1988 ganó la Presidencia Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, como en 2006 la ganó AMLO, le pese a quien le pese.
El domingo asistí, invitado por los organizadores, a un mitin-asamblea de López Obrador en Cuernavaca. Pude observar, entre muchas anaranjadas y rojas, una sola bandera del PRD, aunque había también algunas mantas con el símbolo de este partido, pero en contra de las alianzas con el PRI y con el PAN. Se notó la ausencia, tanto entre el público como en el templete, de los dirigentes locales y nacionales del Partido de la Revolución Democrática. On behalf of the party in Morelos attended and spoke only its general secretary, and other personalities of the allied parties (PT and Convergence) and important social movements in the state.
absent For the PRD, who apparently already AMLO disclaim though because he won elective office as a senate of Morelos, just to give an example, they found her not strategy to empty and even arrange at least one meeting in town (a rally that did not receive even a mention in local newspapers.) Who likes it or not, the rally, López Obrador assembly in Cuernavaca, and elsewhere that has come to organize people filled the plaza without, in the days before the event, announcements in newspapers, radio or television of Morelos. The word of mouth and Internet networks were sufficient to call people from across the state that May Day afternoon.
Behind the ninguneo policy being carried out "mutts " and Ebrard, is an undeniable fact: that AMLO is the only real opposition and not just to frontal Calderón, the PAN and PRI (with their parties extras), but has been unwilling to negotiate with the economic elites ni políticas del país. Lejos de ello, Andrés Manuel se ha dedicado a reunirse con el pueblo y con algunos miembros de las clases medias más politizadas, entre éstas no pocos intelectuales. Marcelo Ebrard, en su encuentro con estudiantes del ITAM, lo dijo con toda claridad: será conveniente priorizar menos lo moral y más qué necesita el país para crecer. Señaló que para lograr ese objetivo se debe ser incluyente con la clase media y la iniciativa privada. Y añadió que se debe tener respeto por el sector empresarial del país y, sobre todo, pensar menos en quién tiene superioridad moral y más en quién necesitamos para lo que sigue en el país; esa será, me parece, una diferencia importante (Note I. Valdez, Millennium online, 04/03/1911).
At that conference the head of the Federal District was trying to establish his differences with López Obrador. Therefore, it is interpreted that the reference on the moral discourse was addressed to his predecessor in the city government, like the emphasis on the middle class and the private sector. The term growth is not safe, what the country needs is development, not only grow, and Ebrard should know the difference between the two concepts, but said growth. The reference to the middle class is not casual: the class, in general, more conservative country, which Really it was believed that AMLO was a danger to Mexico, who despises the poor, because they overcame the origin and not to be identified with them, and paradoxically, admire the truly rich, though many left sharecroppers class between them, driven by the concentration of capital in Mexico has been scandalous. The middle class does not mix with the rabble, the poor ill-clad and poorly fed, except when they should protest the insecurity that is what they think affects them most. Private enterprise, on the other hand, is also varied: Slim is not the same or Azcarraga, the owner of a pizzeria or a clothing store. While the former are increasingly ricos, los segundos tienen que cerrar su negocios, entre otras razones por la inseguridad, que sí existe, pero más que todo porque el número de consumidores ha disminuido por la pauperización creciente de la mayoría de la población del país.
Cuando AMLO señala que el origen de la violencia está en la desigualdad, la pobreza y la falta de oportunidades para los jóvenes, entre otras razones, no está diciendo sino algo que es evidente, pero que no quieren ver los que creen que el crimen organizado se debe exclusivamente a la maldad de los malos y a la incompetencia del gobierno para acabarlos de una vez aunque sea militarizando el país. Para Ebrard la visión Andrés Manuel is moralistic, among other things because it talks of complicity between the government and criminals, and corruption not only down but up. It is also moral because it speaks of human solidarity is a fundamental value in the greatness of a country, especially when the dominant ideology advocates individualism, competition between people, overcoming personal and unique formula for success, success as a realization have money and valemadrismo desperation of others for lack of employment and food.
Of pooches not much to say, are convinced their membership of political and economic elites and political advantages of trading with the established power and the right to handle that gives the fact of not being radical opposition but arranged for the convenience; light, say. Like many, are persuaded that does not advance that does not bargain, regardless of political ethics and principles.
But you no matter who likes it, which is trying to López Obrador is closer to the people-people, which remains majority, organizing not only to vote but to defend the vote (and it does not happen same 1988 and 2006) and truly oppose a draft country that obviously does not please those who have benefited (or believe they are beneficiaries) with consolidated neoliberalism Salinas de Gortari and his successors, PRI and PAN ists ists alike.
I support AMLO, not openly but have differences with him in several respects, it is the only leader who has shown opposition to the neoliberal regime and wants another country based on the development (not growth) ethics in politics, participatory democracy, social solidarity, in reducing poverty and inequality. It is not socialist, nor has it tried, but he and those who support him are convinced that as we go to the disaster (or we're in it?). Urges a change, not just rulers.
http://rodriguezaraujo.unam.mx
[1] Octavio Rodríguez Araujo is a professor at the UNAM Faculty of Political and Social Sciences and one of the most renowned political scientists in the country, a great career as a teacher, researcher and an extensive book publishing, research and articles. Octavio is part of the social struggle of working people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment