Thursday, April 7, 2011

How Long To Continue Estrogen Replacement







Normal
0 Normal 0

shortsightedness

Octavio Rodríguez Araujo

Several other people very much appreciated and I do not deserve any respect have been insisting on the benefits that would have represented the PAN-PRD alliance in the state of Mexico, to defeat the PRI. What we have not been explained is why the PRI defeat fattened broth to diminished PAN.

The recent revelations in

Wikileaks La Jornada show that PRI and PAN before the election of 2006 (I would say that since the government of Salinas de Gortari) are the same. One thing was that much of the PRI governors was against Roberto Madrazo and another that had ceased to be PRI. And if some of these governors supported Calderon was for something very specific: they do not discipline and may in their states do what they wanted. And so it happened. The first beneficiaries of its alliance with the PAN were Ulises Ruiz (Oaxaca) and Mario Marín (Puebla), just to put two outstanding examples.

Lopez Obrador has said repeatedly that the PRI and PAN are the same. And, unfortunately for his critics, he is right. Since Salinas de Gortari attracted PAN making your partner and accomplice to amend the Constitution in favor of the Roman Catholic Church, of transnational corporations, privatization of dozens of bank and public enterprises, the land reforms of Article 27, etc. , it became clear for any observer with a good view was that both the then ruling party, which was changed to the ideology, as the blue and white , followed the same model and agreed on the same policies. Such mimicry between the two parties could check several times and, especially, then when the PRI-dominated state legislatures voted, for example, against the decriminalization of abortion.

What made Salinas de Gortari was to consolidate the new regime and the neoliberal technocratic integration of Mexico subject to economic globalization hegemonized United States and the largest firms control the world economy. Neopriístas and neopanism (these are also new because they are different from the doctrine of pre-1976) share the same table and friendship with them at the dinner where the menu is the distribution of national wealth. Needless to say, among the guests occupy places of honor the rulers of the United States, as in the case of Bush, Clinton and Obama, the economic interests of that country. With Salinas and Zedillo's PRI and the PAN calderonistas Fox and conditions of the mega-millionaires have improved significantly, while increasing in number, the Catholic Church became stronger and more influential now than 30 years ago. Denationalization of the country is a growing process and the state has failed to regulate the economy for the nation and certain conditions of the majority of the population. If that was not enough, the Mexicans had never experienced a period of insecurity, impunity and corruption as we are suffering now, and the latter did not escape many of the PRD that govern or are governed, even at the municipal level.

PRD Some of my friends want to convince us that the consultation and the survey in the state of Mexico was something like a mandate that should be respected. What we have not been explained is why they promoted the consultation and survey so that the PRD is allied with the PAN and why this match, both attacked the PRD in the 2006 election is better than it did the same PRI in 1988. They are, to put it short, simplistic, much like those at this point Kadafi support for the opposition to the dictator has been used, if not sponsored, by the imperialist powers with the intention to repeat, keeping proportions, the model of Afghanistan: Libya to give a convenient Karzai. The case in Libya, but the best opinion of experts, is that both Kadafi as the armed and political interference in the imperialist countries are contrary to the interests of this nation and its majority population. In Mexico, again saving ratio is the same: PAN and PRI are contrary to the interests of this nation and its majority population.

There, as in times of Lopez Portillo, a dispute over the nation (Cordera and Tello), among those who believe in the state model and the neoliberals who want a little or no state controller and much less regulatory the economy. The struggle is not between PRI and PAN, even between them and the pooches

calderonizados. It is between two models of development, they defend, but not want to accept openly, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas and López Obrador (Each with its allies), and the neo-liberals in the colors they are, since they do not make a difference.

is unfortunate shortsightedness of my friends and acquaintances who still insist on the validity and relevance of the Alliance consultation. The strategy here is not should be the politics of the bedroom or around a bountiful table with or without representatives of the U.S. (documented by Wikileaks ) but with the people and social movements, despite the absence of political leadership, they persevere in their opposition but did not see or hear them. The strategy will not go through tactical alliances (not strategic) and circumstantial, but the consistency between what is said and what is done in a context of opposition to the existing and construction of a new country, fairer, less unequal, less corrupt and more independent.

Mexicans, but did not disclose the polls, we're tired of being only interested parties to vote, we want results, we want substantial changes, we re proud of our country as a sovereign and prosperous , and no longer in the negative slope that led us to PRI and PAN, and PRD in name but not conviction. As very rightly said Javier Sicilia, we to the mother, and increasingly we will be dissenters.

http://rodriguezaraujo.unam.mx

Posted by admin at 7:00 PM

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)